[ROVERNET - UK] RE: Rover news

David Read defender110 at ozemail.com.au
Sat Jul 1 00:30:30 BST 2006

Better and more on topic than buses and coracles.

South Oz
(SEND pressed intentionally ;-)

Kent Kinard wrote:
> So Glen,
> What is a "real" Rover?  Is a Jensen not a Jensen when it has an engine 
> from Austin, or Chrysler or Lotus?
> Is a Marcos not a Marcos if it has a Ford, or Volvo or Rover engine?  Is 
> a Morgan not a Morgan if it has a Triumph or BMW engine?
> Is a Rover not a Rover if it has a Honda or Buick or VM engine?  Is it 
> once again spring when the sap rises and Roverites debate the question 
> of the ages in its latest iteration?  Is a Rover a Rover if it is built  
> in China? Were New Zealand and South African built Rovers any less a Rover?
> And so it begins....again....
> Roverevolutionarily,
> Kent K.
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 12:20:09 -0400
>  Glen Wilson <glenwilson at cavtel.net> wrote:
>> On Friday 30 June 2006 12:03, Eric Russell wrote:
>>> Now would that be the old Rover 75 or the NEW Rover
>>> 75?
>>> from  "died in the wool" P6 owner with no idea about
>>> any 75
>> That would be an "old" 75 which was a REAL Rover...
>> Oh, my God! Did I click...SEND?!?!?!?!
>> (flames)
>> ;-)
>> Glen

More information about the rovernet mailing list