[ROVERNET - UK] 2000Tc rebuild

Paul Smith vmi2148 at bigpond.net.au
Sun Oct 31 02:30:02 GMT 2004

I have a 9:1 TC, it is very different to the 9:1 SC above 3000rpm.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Robertson" <rover2000nut at hotmail.com>
To: <rovernet at lyris.ccdata.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 11:46 AM
Subject: [ROVERNET - UK] 2000Tc rebuild

> I,m just starting to build up my other 1967 2000TC's motor right now , 
> before building up a 2200 overbored engine for my 69  TC........Everything 
> in the fleet will be mobile and roadworthy by next spring i 
> hope...........My question is as i searched through a huge lot of parts i 
> scored off a disheartened Rover owner, there was a set of new 9:1 
> pistons...........I have many old 10:1 and one set of old 9:1 that have 
> come from many parts cars ...............My 69 has 10:1 right now and in 
> all the years i've had Rovers they have  all been 10:1 
> engines..............Is there much less of a performance difference  with 
> the 9:1 or should i go ahead  and use them and not have to worry about 
> Octane boosters anymore............I just don,t want to end up with a TC 
> that runs like an SC
> Bill Robertson
> _________________________________________________________________
> Take charge with a pop-up guard built on patented Microsoft® SmartScreen 
> Technology 
> http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines 
> Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the 
> first two months FREE*.
> _______________________________________________
> rovernet mailing list
> rovernet at lyris.ccdata.com
> To unsubscribe, go to this web page, look near the bottom and follow 
> instructions:
> http://mailman.nipltd.com/mailman/listinfo/rovernet 

More information about the rovernet mailing list