[ROVERNET - UK] Kent Kinard

[Glen Wilson]

Alan,

Looks like you have the correct address.

Sometimes Kent wears himself out on Sunday and sleeps right through to 
Tuesday morning.  I'd wait a couple of hours and try again.

Glen



JULIET KEILER wrote:
> Sorry to bomb the list but my reply to your email has just returned Kent. Not sure why it didn't make it but didn't want you to think I was ignoring you!  :)
>
> Have left the gobaldygook in so other more experienced emailers may be able to expain why.
>
> Alan Francis (partviking)
>
> ----- Forwarded Message ----
> From: "MAILER-DAEMON at yahoo.com" <MAILER-DAEMON at yahoo.com>
> To: lingfield51 at btinternet.com
> Sent: Monday, 19 November, 2007 9:32:53 PM
> Subject: failure notice
>
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>
> <kkinard at wcc.net>:
> Connected to 207.43.255.10 but connection died. (#4.4.2)
> I'm not going to try again; this message has been in the queue too long.
>
> --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
>
> Return-Path: <lingfield51 at btinternet.com>
> Received: (qmail 56737 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Nov 2007 20:32:51 -0000
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
>   s=s1024; d=btinternet.com;
>   h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;
>   b=55kSCFeSs7NyBdgCVLW/iztOIwQFXnFx2Vq32TAaJYwKtejlr3fSo4jK+GSVlUZDE0GOztYHQzPwf9AMGX5yHyq1v6frE+3TEki/fz8+hlMZvPON8kJgnsrEfdn2WFcJBW+gnVgv6MpJf+iP9zlwwe4YD+EBS820eS+Yohzx104=;
> X-YMail-OSG: L_TdB_kVM1l8WdJ5vIQTUQb4QSfTQ497J0xvIwIzNIP.n9hG
> Received: from [81.158.201.140] by web86013.mail.ird.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:32:51 GMT
> X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/818.27 YahooMailWebService/0.7.152
> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:32:51 +0000 (GMT)
> From: JULIET KEILER <lingfield51 at btinternet.com>
> Subject: Re: Ooops I meant Lockheed booster
> To: Kent Kinard <kkinard at wcc.net>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Message-ID: <638602.56325.qm at web86013.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
>
> Hi Kent,=0A            Many thanks for your email(s) It is not unusual to h=
> ave Dunlop calipers with a Girling/Lockheed servo (booster). The A suffix c=
> ars had complete Dunlop systems but as Dunlop were taken over by Girling ar=
> ound 1965 they started converting P6's first by fitting a Girling servo fro=
> m Suffix B (about mid 1965 I think) followed by fitting Girling calipers Su=
> ffix C (about mid-1966). My car is a early 1964 so should have a complete D=
> unlop system but at some point in the past has had a Girling Servo fitted. =
> Although in the overall scheme of things it doesn't matter i would like to =
> try and return the car to original as I do feel it's important some cars re=
> main as built and all to often they get fitted with later parts often as a =
> result of unavailability or financial expediency.=0A=0AThe Dunlop servo bra=
> ckets were different to Girling ones hence my desire to try and track one d=
> own. Getting a servo is not to difficult as many people have removed them w=
> hen scrapping cars but of course they didn't bother removing the brackets..=
> .. in fairness why would they!=0A=0AI realise Suffix A cars are thin on the=
> ground but hopefully there may be a shell out there somewhere and chances =
> are the brackets would still be on the car.=0A=0AThe only way I can describ=
> e the differnece is that on Dunlop cars the bracket nearest the windscreen =
> is a complete circle of metal around the end of the servo and has a bolt th=
> at squeezes it together working along the same lines as a strap wrench fits=
> wound an oil filter. On Girling cars this bracket has the circle of steel =
> split and is squeezed together with a pinch bolt. Not easy to describe in a=
> n email but if you think you may have  a possible suspect i can scan a page=
> of the parts catalouge showing both.=0A=0AGood to hear from you again and =
> hope your ministering both spiritual and Roverley is in fine form.=0A=0AKin=
> dest regards=0A=0AAlan=0A      =0A=0A----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: Ke=
> nt Kinard <kkinard at wcc.net>=0ATo: lingfield51 at btinternet.com=0ASent: Monday=
> , 12 November, 2007 2:36:44 PM=0ASubject: Ooops I meant Lockheed booster=0A=
> =0AHi Alan,=0AMy head is not in gear this morning.  My cars have Dunlop bra=
> kes and =0ALockheed boosters.  I've got P5 stuff stuck in my head and can't=
> flush =0Ait out.=0A=0AKent K.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rovernet mailing list
> rovernet at lyris.ccdata.com
> To unsubscribe, go to this web page, look near the bottom and follow instructions:
> http://mailman.nipltd.com/mailman/listinfo/rovernet
> Back-up list and photos at:
> http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/Rover_net/
>
>