[ROVERNET - UK] 2000TC rebuild

[Paul Smith]

Other info:
My uncle had a 10:1 TC, built a 9:1 2200 and put it in.
He found the 2200 was better up to 2500rpm, and it was pretty even after
that.  Generally it was more driveable due to bottom end.

PVS

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Robertson [mailto:rover2000nut at hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 1 November 2004 4:05 am
To: rovernet at lyris.ccdata.com
Subject: [ROVERNET - UK] 2000TC rebuild


THanks........Yes Eric i am building a 2200 rebore for my 69 but my 67 which

i will probably give to my son, or sell... i would like to use up some of my

spare parts i have lying around...........I just want to know if anyone has 
had a standard 10:1 compression TC and a 9:1 compression TC and compared
them...........With so much standard parts downstairs its a shame to waste
them when a few of the blocks are fine and don,t need bored out 
yet.............I haven,t come across any articles on the difference in 
performance..................Maybe I should build up a few engines  with all

the parts and  power my lawnmower, and weed whacker with them
Thanks Bill

_________________________________________________________________
Take advantage of powerful junk e-mail filters built on patented Microsoft® 
SmartScreen Technology. 
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=htt
p://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines 
  Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN® Premium right now and get the
first two months FREE*.


_______________________________________________
rovernet mailing list
rovernet at lyris.ccdata.com
To unsubscribe, go to this web page, look near the bottom and follow
instructions:
http://mailman.nipltd.com/mailman/listinfo/rovernet